Let’s dig into the heart of the blood type diet science:Įnough of the logical arguments, let’s see what research shows. While individual people may have digestive problems with a specific food, all-in-all these were staple foods that kept our ancestors alive and healthy, passing on their genes to the next generations. This would indicate that there have been negative health consequences for ~40% of the population throughout history whenever they ate the staple foods of their people (e.g. Take the recommendations for type O as an example: The blood type diet claims people with this blood type should avoid wheat, corn, and lentils because it causes negative health consequences such as cirrhosis. Second common-sense point: Next up is the idea that people with specific blood types should avoid specific foods because it will cause an agglutination (clumping of cells) reaction in their blood. My point is that there has been a nice mix of blood types in different population groups for thousands of years.Ĭommunities and families with different blood types have been eating their meals together throughout history. (data source)Ĭool charts, but does this actually matter when it comes to serving up dinner? Nope. For example, there is a higher percentage of type B+ people who are African American than there are in Caucasian population groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |